macro_jit_x64: Should not skip zero registers for certain ALU ops
The code generated for these ALU ops assume src_a and src_b are always valid.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b660ef6c8a
commit
a6ddd7c382
|
@ -56,11 +56,13 @@ void MacroJITx64Impl::Compile_ALU(Macro::Opcode opcode) {
|
|||
const bool valid_operation = !is_a_zero && !is_b_zero;
|
||||
const bool is_move_operation = !is_a_zero && is_b_zero;
|
||||
const bool has_zero_register = is_a_zero || is_b_zero;
|
||||
const bool no_zero_reg_skip = opcode.alu_operation == Macro::ALUOperation::AddWithCarry ||
|
||||
opcode.alu_operation == Macro::ALUOperation::SubtractWithBorrow;
|
||||
|
||||
Xbyak::Reg32 src_a;
|
||||
Xbyak::Reg32 src_b;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!optimizer.zero_reg_skip) {
|
||||
if (!optimizer.zero_reg_skip || no_zero_reg_skip) {
|
||||
src_a = Compile_GetRegister(opcode.src_a, RESULT);
|
||||
src_b = Compile_GetRegister(opcode.src_b, eax);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Reference in New Issue