Makes the header more general for other potential algorithms in the
future. While we're at it, include a missing <functional> include to
satisfy the use of std::less.
Implement VOTE using Nvidia's intrinsics. Documentation about these can
be found here
https://developer.nvidia.com/reading-between-threads-shader-intrinsics
Instead of using portable ARB instructions I opted to use Nvidia
intrinsics because these are the closest we have to how Tegra X1
hardware renders.
To stub VOTE on non-Nvidia drivers (including nouveau) this commit
simulates a GPU with a warp size of one, returning what is meaningful
for the instruction being emulated:
* anyThreadNV(value) -> value
* allThreadsNV(value) -> value
* allThreadsEqualNV(value) -> true
ballotARB, also known as "uint64_t(activeThreadsNV())", emits
VOTE.ANY Rd, PT, PT;
on nouveau's compiler. This doesn't match exactly to Nvidia's code
VOTE.ALL Rd, PT, PT;
Which is emulated with activeThreadsNV() by this commit. In theory this
shouldn't really matter since .ANY, .ALL and .EQ affect the predicates
(set to PT on those cases) and not the registers.
When #2247 was created, thread_queue_list.h was the only user of
boost-related code, however #2252 moved the page table struct into
common, which makes use of Boost.ICL, so we need to add the dependency
to the common library's link interface again.
We really don't need to pull in several headers of boost related
machinery just to perform the erase-remove idiom (particularly with
C++20 around the corner, which adds universal container std::erase and
std::erase_if, which we can just use instead).
With this, we don't need to link in anything boost-related into common.
This is an analog of BitSet from Dolphin that was introduced to allow
iterating over a set of bits. Given it's currently unused, and given
that std::bitset exists, we can remove this. If it's ever needed in the
future it can be brought back.
Xbyak is currently entirely unused. Rather than carting it along, remove
it and get rid of a dependency. If it's ever needed in the future, then
it can be re-added (and likely be more up to date at that point in
time).
Everything from here is completely unused and also written with the
notion of supporting 32-bit architecture variants in mind. Given the
Switch itself is on a 64-bit architecture, we won't be supporting 32-bit
architectures. If we need specific allocation functions in the future,
it's likely more worthwhile to new functions for that purpose.
These currently aren't used and contain commented out source code that
corresponds to Dolphin's JIT. Given our CPU code is organized quite
differently, we shouldn't be keeping this around (at the moment it just
adds to compile times marginally).
bunnei
ReinUsesLisp
James Rowe
Zach Hilman
Fernando Sahmkow
Lioncash
unknown
Frederic L
fearlessTobi
MerryMage
CaptV0rt3x