We really don't need to pull in several headers of boost related
machinery just to perform the erase-remove idiom (particularly with
C++20 around the corner, which adds universal container std::erase and
std::erase_if, which we can just use instead).
With this, we don't need to link in anything boost-related into common.
This makes the class much more flexible and doesn't make performing
copies with classes that contain a bitfield member a pain.
Given BitField instances are only intended to be used within unions, the
fact the full storage value would be copied isn't a big concern (only
sizeof(union_type) would be copied anyways).
While we're at it, provide defaulted move constructors for consistency.
When making the initial implementation, I forgot to add the series variable to the AmiiboConfig struct.
With this PR it is added and many of the AmiiboConfig fields get their proper values now.
The loading of the Amiibo data that is added here has been hwtested.
This fixes Amiibos in Yoshis Woolly World, Smash (partially) and probably other games too.
wwylele / 白疾風Today at 6:14 PM
I doubt the performance of constructing regex everytime the function is called
Is TrimSourcePath only called by logging? if so, you can move the implementation into logging, and cache the regex object into global
This function is probably too specific to be in common anyway
* gdbstub: fix IsMemoryBreak() returning false while connected to client
As a result, the only existing codepath for a memory watchpoint hit to break into GDB (InterpeterMainLoop, GDB_BP_CHECK, ARMul_State::RecordBreak) is finally taken,
which exposes incorrect logic* in both RecordBreak and ServeBreak.
* a blank BreakpointAddress structure is passed, which sets r15 (PC) to NULL
* gdbstub: DynCom: default-initialize two members/vars used in conditionals
* gdbstub: DynCom: don't record memory watchpoint hits via RecordBreak()
For now, instead check for GDBStub::IsMemoryBreak() in InterpreterMainLoop and ServeBreak.
Fixes PC being set to a stale/unhit breakpoint address (often zero) when a memory watchpoint (rwatch, watch, awatch) is handled in ServeBreak() and generates a GDB trap.
Reasons for removing a call to RecordBreak() for memory watchpoints:
* The``breakpoint_data`` we pass is typed Execute or None. It describes the predicted next code breakpoint hit relative to PC;
* GDBStub::IsMemoryBreak() returns true if a recent Read/Write operation hit a watchpoint. It doesn't specify which in return, nor does it trace it anywhere. Thus, the only data we could give RecordBreak() is a placeholder BreakpointAddress at offset NULL and type Access. I found the idea silly, compared to simply relying on GDBStub::IsMemoryBreak().
There is currently no measure in the code that remembers the addresses (and types) of any watchpoints that were hit by an instruction, in order to send them to GDB as "extended stop information."
I'm considering an implementation for this.
* gdbstub: Change an ASSERT to DEBUG_ASSERT
I have never seen the (Reg[15] == last_bkpt.address) assert fail in practice, even after several weeks of (locally) developping various branches around GDB. Only leave it inside Debug builds.
Weiyi Wang
Lioncash
Vamsi Krishna
James Rowe
xperia64
liushuyu
fearlessTobi
Alex James
BreadFish64
Dimitri A
bunnei